|
Issue 029 <previous< Issue 030 October
2000 Volume 6 Number 5
>next> Issue
031 |
|
Defeating the Demons The Prevention of Clergy Sexual Abuse Clergy sexual misconduct
has not reached epidemic proportions, but most experts agree that the
number of incidents is increasing. Reliable research over the past fifteen
years concludes that about 10-12 percent of ministers have engaged in
sexual intercourse with members of their congregation, and about 25-35
percent of clergymen have admitted to sexually inappropriate behavior with
parishioners.[i] If sexual misconduct by
the clergy is so common, and if virtually all ministers are tempted to sin
sexually, what can be done to prevent this destructive behavior? Why do
some ministers fall and others do not? Are there preventative measures
that can help ministers and churches nip in the bud this breach of power
and trust? Clergy sexual abuse is
seldom an isolated action. The sexual exploitation of a congregant by a
minister is a complex problem involving a confluence of circumstances and
motivations, especially the twin dynamics of sexuality and power. While serving as a
missionary in Africa, Dee Miller was sexually assaulted by an SBC
missionary co-worker.[ii]
Out of her ordeal she has become an advocate for survivors and a
recognized authority on clergy sexual abuse. Recently she wrote, “The
demons are not the perpetrators. They aren’t the colluders, and
certainly not the survivors. I’ve named the collective demons in an
acronym--DIM thinking--Denial, Ignorance, and Minimization.”[iii] To address the problem and stem the
tide, ministers and churches must develop constructive ways to “defeat
the demons” of sexual abuse. Some offer a
straightforward solution to the problem: the church should weed out those
who are likely to abuse. Certainly ordination and ministerial placement
should be limited to persons of the highest spiritual maturity and moral
integrity (1 Tim. 3:1-13). No one disagrees with that principle. However,
clergy sexual abuse is very difficult to predict. As Christian
psychologists Jack Balswick and John Thoburn confirm, “No one factor in
and of itself can be identified as the reason why a given minister
succumbs to a sexual temptation. In most cases, a combination of factors
contributes to their behavior.”[iv] Adding to the difficulty
of predicting abuse is the fact that comparatively little has been written
about what factors make a person vulnerable to victimization. Even less is
available on what makes an individual in the institutional church
vulnerable to colluding.[v] A better approach for
preventing clergy sexual misconduct is to equip ministers and churches to
understand negative influences and encourage positive resistance. Clergy
and churches must refuse to succumb to the demons of denial, ignorance,
and minimization, which usually foster secrecy and collusion. Research
indicates that ministers who withstand sexual temptation understand their
own personal susceptibility, recognize the danger signals, and build
strong support systems. Churches assist in prevention by perceiving the
dynamics of the clergy role, encouraging methods of accountability for its
ministers, and developing wise policies. For perpetrators,
victims, and colluders, the first step in the prevention of clergy abuse
is a personal recognition of the actual problem. An inadequate approach is
to ask, “Who’s at fault?” The blame game usually misreads the
situation and offers little help for prevention. Some blame the minister
who profanes his calling by taking advantage of a vulnerable church
member. Some blame the church that puts its pastor under pressure to
perform. Some identify the culprit as a seductive female or an inadequate
wife. Sex abuse expert Marie
Fortune insists most offending ministers violate ethical sexual boundaries
long before they commit vocational suicide. “It’s not about sex.
It’s a misuse of power.” Fortune observes that church members want to
excuse the pastor and often slip into denial. But it is not fair to the
pastor or the congregation to ignore the problem. “We need to say,
‘Look, it was wrong. It was unethical behavior.’”[vi] The ministry is a very
attractive profession for anyone who is looking to exploit
vulnerable people, claims Roy Woodruff, executive director of the
3000 member American Association of Pastoral Counselors. “The average
parish pastor has no one he reports to or is supervised by. And he has a
lot of needy people coming for help. A pastor who could be needy himself
can exploit the needs of others.”[vii] Even for sexual
relationships described as consensual, abuse of power is an issue.
Whenever there is a significant power imbalance, as a counselor/client or
pastor/parishioner relationship, consensual sex is always an abusive act
that exploits the powerless victim. Awareness of the dynamics
of clergy sexual abuse is basic to all other prevention strategies. Every
minister needs to realize that he is at risk to cross the boundary into
the forbidden zone every day. The male pastor is not exempt from sexual
attraction to congregants. He must be aware of his feelings and honestly
acknowledge the sexual urges he senses. In addition, as a
professional caregiver, the minister is a special target for sexual
failure. Some ministers have difficulty accepting their limitations,
especially in counseling members of the opposite gender. Pastors who see
themselves as rescuers may create a codependent relationship that is
dangerous. A rescuer-healer minister is susceptible to sexual failure
because he may cross over healthy boundaries to fulfill his own personal
needs.[viii] A minister must be aware
of personal susceptibilities that make him more prone toward sexual abuse.
Deep-seated insecurities, which easily surface as sexual and power needs,
often fuel misconduct. Unresolved questions relating to a pastor’s own
sexuality, especially destructive experiences from the past, can
contribute to the exploitation of others. Sexual addiction is a critical
influence upon some abusers. Pastoral counselor
Woodruff contends sexually abusive ministers usually fit one of two
profiles: the “prima donna” or the depressed pastor.[ix]
The “prima donna” pastor operates out of a desire for power and
control, loses touch with boundaries, over directs peoples’ lives, and
develops a sense of “I can do no wrong.” Central to this person is the
idea of entitlement--that he is “entitled” to certain behavior that
others are not. The highly publicized televangelist scandals and the
sexual failure of many contemporary mega church pastors illustrate this
type. At the other extreme is
the depressed pastor, whose judgment becomes cloudy because of very low
self-esteem and a growing inability to function as a minister or as a man.
Thus he becomes vulnerable to relationships that provide gratification.
The high-profile pastor and the despondent minister share one fatal
weakness--isolation. Out of her experiences
with survivors, Dee Miller has identified a wide range of factors that
increase a person’s vulnerability to be abused. Being younger than the
perpetrator, smaller in size, of a minority race, and having a limited
support system increases vulnerability. Quite often the female victim
lives alone or is a minor whose parents are uninvolved in the church. Many
of the abused are employees of the church. Crises that increase
vulnerability are marital problems, domestic violence, a recent divorce or
death of a spouse, or a minor who is separated from one or both parents.
Chronic health problems also contribute to victimization.[x] What positive lessons can
be learned from this summary of significant factors related to clergy
sexual abuse? First, ministers inclined to abuse urgently need personal
therapy. For them, the personal and professional risk of ministering to
women is too great. For pastors who do not
sense vulnerability toward abusing parishioners, but who do recognize the
reality of sexual temptation, the dynamics of the pastor/congregant
relationship may offer another lesson. Peter Rutter observes, “Every
forbidden-zone relationship in which sexual tension appears also presents
an opportunity to heal.”[xi]
The male minister holds the power to move the arousal of sexual feelings
beyond temptation into an opportunity for the healing of deeper wounds. He
alone can turn an impending disaster into a life-giving moment. Knowing the warning signs
of clergy sexual abuse can aid the prevention of it. Lebacqz and Barton
insist that ministers should be aware of their boundaries and always seek
to maintain those borders. “Even if the boundaries for sexual
intimacy are the same for pastor and lay person, the responsibility
for maintaining those boundaries fall to the professional person.”[xii]
Ministers need a
“warning system” that will alert them when they are approaching
unacceptable levels of intimacy with parishioners. Lebacqz and Barton have
proposed a checklist of signals that warn ministers when they are headed
for trouble:
Marie Fortune has
developed a list of questions that pose the possibility of sexual
misconduct: Is the minister doing a lot of counseling beyond his or her
scope of responsibility? Is the person not taking care of himself or
herself, canceling vacations, and neglecting time with family? Does the
person tend to sexualize conversations? Are mechanisms of accountability
being ignored? Is lay leadership discouraged? Does everything in the
church focus on the pastor?[xiv] The vulnerability of the
counseling process has led some to conclude that pastors should not
counsel at all or restrict their counseling to the same sex. However,
counseling across gender lines is an inevitable part of pastoral ministry.
A better approach is to establish some necessary precautions that help
prevent sexual misconduct. Guidelines for pastoral counseling usually
stress: (1) Always have another person nearby when counseling; (2) Develop
a method which prevents total privacy in the counseling office (unlocked
door, glass panel, etc.); (3) Publish counseling guidelines; (4) Create a
referral list for persons needing long-term counseling; (5) Decide in
advance and indicate to counselees how much touching is appropriate. Grenz and Bell offer six
warning signs that indicate boundaries are being violated:
One of the best ways to
ensure responsible sexual behavior is for the minister to build strong
support systems. Accountability relationships offer a crucial antidote for
misconduct. A wholesome marriage
reinforces sexual fidelity. The research of Balswick and Thoburn revealed,
“Over one fourth of the pastors cite their relationship with their wife
as the most important reason for sexual fidelity.” The study also
concluded, “Marital dissatisfaction coupled with work boredom is the
kind of situation that has been conducive to the most fantasy and openness
to actual liaisons.”[xvi] A good marriage provides
a wholesome context for sexual expression. It enhances intimacy and
facilitates honest communication, while reminding the married church
leader that he is accountable. Colleagues and personal counselors provide
another support group. A pastor should not hesitate to seek personal
counseling from a qualified therapist when he needs inner healing and
emotional health. Models and mentors make
an important supportive contribution. Many pastors have formed
accountability groups who meet regularly to develop trust, offer
encouragement, and hold one another morally accountable. The greatest role model
for ministers is Jesus, who ministered to women without moral compromise.
He viewed each woman he encountered through God’s eyes, not as objects
for selfish gratification, but persons with deep needs and spiritual
aspirations. As disciples of Christ, pastors are to minister to women as
Jesus did. Prevention for the
individual minister should begin during the preparation for ministry. Both
seminary students and ministers serving in churches need information and
clarification of ethical standards for ministry. Marie Fortune believes
ministers “need to understand the nature of the power and authority of
their role and the responsibility that goes with it. They need to learn
how to maintain boundaries in relationships with parishioners and
counselees. They need to learn to care for their own emotional and sexual
needs in appropriate ways.”[xvii] Individual churches share
some responsibility for prevention. Issues that churches must address
beyond the basic education of their leaders include employment policies
for ministerial search committees and procedures for handling allegations
of sexual misconduct by ministers.[xviii]
One reality that compounds the problem of clergy sexual abuse is the
common practice of perpetrators to move from one state to another, one
institution to another, and one denomination to another. The structure and
practice of Baptist churches make them vulnerable to traveling abusers
unless they do a thorough background check on every potential minister. If
a past history of sexual abuse is discovered in a candidate, the church
body should be informed. Most professionals
operate under an accepted code of ethics developed and enforced by their
peers. Authorship, instruction, and enforcement are three major problems
in writing a code of ethics for clergy.[xix]
In addition, autonomous Baptist churches have been reluctant to accept one
standard code of ethics for all ministers. However, a growing number
of church leaders believe a ministerial code of ethics is possible and
necessary. Christian psychologist Archibald Hart notes that unlike mental
health professionals, ministers are only loosely bound by a commonly
understood moral code that is subject to differing interpretations.
Clearly articulated boundaries for ministry relationships would help to
prevent many problems arising in the minister’s sexual relationships.[xx] Defeating the demons of
clergy sexual abuse is no easy battle. The war of prevention will have to
be waged on many fronts. Denial is deadly. As long as the church ignores
the problem or cajoles victims to remain silent, the problem persists.
Ignorance compounds the issue and augments the damage sexual abuse
perpetrates. To minimize clergy sexual misconduct is to become a colluder,
one who joins the perpetrator in victimizing the vulnerable and their
families. Prevention, therefore, is the responsibility of us all. [i].Joe
E. Trull & James E. Carter, Ministerial Ethics: Being A Good Minister
In A Not-So-Good World (Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1993), 81. [ii].Read
her story in How Little We Knew: Collusion and Confusion with Sexual
Misconduct (Lafayette, LA: Prescott Press, 1983), available from the
author at 613 Frank St., Council Bluffs, IA 51503. [iii].Dee
Miller, “Moving Beyond Our Fears,” 1998, an unpublished article used by
permission.. [iv].Jack
Balswick and John Thoburn, “How Ministers Deal With Sexual Temptation,” Pastoral
Psychology, 1991, 285. [v].Dee
Miller, “How Could She?” 1998, an unpublished article used by permission. [vi].Cited
by Greg Warner in “With sexual misconduct, all suffer in blame game,”
Associated Baptist Press, 23 December 1993, 6-8. [vii].Ibid. [viii].Stanley
J. Grenz & Roy D. Bell, Betrayal of Trust: Sexual Misconduct in the
Pastorate (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1995), 132. [ix].Warner,
4. [x].Miller,
“How Could She?” [xi].Peter
Rutter, Sex in the Forbidden Zone (Los Angeles: Jeremy P. Tarcher,
1989), 223. [xii].Karen
Lebacqz and Ronald Barton, Sex in the Parish (Louisville:
Westminster/John Knox Press, 1991), 107-8. [xiii].Ibid,
65. [xiv].Warner,
6. See also Marie M. Fortune, Is Nothing Sacred? When Sex Invades
the Pastoral Relationship (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), 106-7
and 148-53. [xv].Grenz
and Bell, 145. [xvi].Balswick
and Thoburn, 280, 270. [xvii].Fortune,
106. [xviii].Marie
Fortune closes her book Is Nothing Sacred? with a model of procedure
developed by the American Lutheran Church for responding to complaints of
unethical behavior by clergy, 135-153. [xix].For
a full discussion of the pros and cons of a Code of Ethics for ministers, see
Trull and Carter, 182-215, as well as numerous sample denominational codes,
220-256. [xx].Richard
Blackmon and Archibald Hart, “Personal Growth for Clergy” in Richard Hunt,
John Hinkle, Jr., and H. Newton Malony, eds., Clergy Assessment and Career
Development (Nashville: Abingdon, 1990), 39.
Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2000 |
|
|