|
Issue 029 <previous< Issue 030 October
2000 Volume 6 Number 5
>next> Issue
031 |
|
Commencement
Address The University of Texas --- May 20, 2000 I’m very fortunate to
be here tonight for the first millennial class ever to graduate from the
University of Texas. It’s an honor to be part of this historical
occasion. And I intend to repay you by being brief. I know you are eager
to get out of here because on Monday morning each of you has to select a
board of directors by 10:00, issue an IPO by noon, and open a bank account
by 3 with your first million. In that endeavor nothing I say will be of
much help to you, but I wish you well. I must seem an alien to
you. I come from the old country, the past. You can’t get there from
here. Our generations hardly speak the same language. When I was here
fifty years ago bunnies were still small rabbits and rabbits were not
Volkswagens. A ‘chip’ was off the old block, hardware meant a hammer
and nails, and software wasn’t even a word. We didn’t know of FM
radio, tape decks, artificial hearts, word processors, or dot.coms. Fast
food was what the Catholics on campus ate during Lent, and ‘making
out’ referred to how we did on our exams. Grass was mowed, Coke was a
cold drink, and pot was something you cooked with. I come from a foreign
country; I come from the past. But although you and I
are separated by half a century of experience, we do have in common this
university, which others built for us. I say it every time I come back –
perhaps I keep coming back just to say it: This university is a living
thing. All the men and women who have been part of this campus – student
and faculty, security guard and secretary – breathed something of
themselves into it. The Tower soars above us tonight because all those
before us secured its foundation on solid ground. That may be the most
important thing I learned here – that nothing lasts that isn’t well
grounded: Love, marriage, friendship, sanity, knowledge, institutions,
democracy – without deep roots, they perish. I graduated from the
university just about at midpoint between your millennial class of 2000
and the first centennial class of 1900. This place was a frontier 100
years ago. The entire enrollment consisted of 582 students, wearing coats
and ties or long dresses down to their ankles. They arrived here by train
or on horseback to a campus that was a thicket of trees and wild weeds
crisscrossed by cattle trails. Some carried guns. When one student missed
his homework assignment because of illness, his professor insinuated that
he was lying. The student promptly pulled his pistol and demanded the
professor take it back. He did. Like you, the class of
1900 graduated with great expectations. The turn of the century crackled
with optimism. It was, as one writer describes it, ‘the heyday of a
liberal civilization that had seemed to spread steadily and grow stronger
for most of the 19th century. It’s articles of faith were
that science and technology were the sources of a prosperity without
limits, that the free market would spread the new abundance across
boundaries and nations, that liberty and democracy were gaining ground
everywhere.’ (Jonathan Schell, Harper’s Magazine, January 2000). Sure enough, the 20th
century brought extraordinary progress. Between the class of 1900 and
yours, the life span of Americans increased by more than 30 years. Only a
third of bachelor’s degrees went to women in 1900, compared to well over
a half today. No one in that class had heard of Alcoholics Anonymous, Dr.
Seuss, Earth Day, hot running water, Amnesty International, Gay and
Lesbian Pride, paperback books, transatlantic air traffic, Rocky and
Bullwinkle, sticky note, the zipper or the personal computer. But just look at us now.
Roughly three out of four American homes have air conditioning, and none
did then. Over half of our homes have dishwashers, and none did then.
Ninety-eight percent have television and two-thirds have cable. Nearly
half of our homes have one or more computers, and more that 40 percent of
American adults use the Internet. Impressive. Of course this is not the
whole story. If the class of 1900 couldn’t peer into a crystal ball and
see the coming achievements of science and technology, neither could they
see what else the future had in store. They couldn’t see the mass
extermination ahead – the blood and muck of the first Great War when a
million men would die in a single battle. They couldn’t see the smoke of
human fodder rising from the ovens of Buchenwald and Dachau. They
couldn’t see Dresden lighted at night by incendiaries falling from the
sky like sparkles from a fairy wand. And they couldn’t see the mushroom
cloud over Hiroshima or Nagasaki. The future is a blank. We never know if
it’s going to turn out a fit place to be, because we can’t be sure how
humans will fill it in. The 20th century brought an epidemic of
life; it also brought a plague of death. During my time at the university
in the 50s, one of my English teachers told us that if we learned nothing
else, she hoped we would learn from the poet Rilke “To assume our
existence as broadly as we can, in any way we can. Everything, even the
unheard of, must be possible in this life. The only courage demanded of us
is courage for the most singular and the most inexplicable that we may
encounter.” Right now our encounter
is with an explosion of technology and wealth that boggles the mind.
Records are broken and new milestones reached every day. Dot.com
billionaires sprout like bluebonnets in the hill country, and in just one
decade the number of millionaires has quadrupled from two million to eight
million. (Robert Reich, The American Prospect, May 2000). You begin to think it
will last forever, lifting the boats on Lake Austin and the yachts on the
ocean to one height after another. But every now and then a message
arrives unexpected, like a bottle washing up ashore, and we’re suddenly
startled by the unthinkable. Bill Joy sent us one
message the other day. Bill Joy is a giant of the computer revolution –
the cofounder and chief scientist of Sun Microsystems. Beginning as a
graduate student inventing new worlds inside machines, he moved from
workstations and personal computers to the creation of advanced
microprocessor technologies and Internet techniques such as Java and
Jinni. This man is no Luddite. He values the scientific search for truth
and the ability of engineering to improve life. But in a remarkable
article this spring in Wired magazine, Bill Joy confesses to deep concerns
over the unintended consequences of 21st century technologies.
He acknowledges that the most compelling of them – robotics, genetic
engineering, and nanotechnologies – can significantly extend our average
life span even further, conquer diseases, and increase crop yields. But
robots, engineered organisms, and nanobots also share a dangerous and
amplifying factor. They can replicate themselves. One can become many, and
the many take on a life of their own, leaping beyond our control. Look at the history of
antibiotics, he says – with the emergence of antibiotic and much more
dangerous bacteria that go on reproducing themselves despite our efforts
to kill them. Earlier in his career
Bill Joy doubted we could create an intelligent robot that can evolve
copies of itself and function on its own. No longer. Now he believes that
by the year 2030, when you are still younger than I am now, we are likely
to be able to build machines, in quantity, a million times more powerful
than the personal computer of today. Such machines, operating according to
their own nature, could lead to our extinction, he says: “We may well
not survive the encounter with a superior species of machines that occur
when we download ourselves into our own technology.” Moreover, these 21st
century technologies are so powerful that they can spawn whole new classes
of accidents and abuses. Most dangerously, these accidents and abuses will
be widely within the reach of individuals or small groups. They will not
– unlike atomic and nuclear weapons – require large facilities or rare
raw materials, or be under the control of nation states. Knowledge alone
will enable the use of them. Thus, “we have the possibility not just of
weapons of mass destruction but of knowledge-enabled mass destruction
hugely amplified by the power of self-replication. I think it is no
exaggeration to say we are on the cusp of the further perfection of
extreme evil, an evil whose possibility spreads well beyond that which
weapons of mass destruction bequeathed to the nation-states, on to a
surprising and terrible empowerment of extreme individuals.” The thrust of his message
is this: The nuclear, biological, and chemical technologies used in 20th
century weapons of mass destruction were and are largely military,
developed in government laboratories. In sharp contrast, the 21st
century technologies – with science as their handmaiden – are
delivering a series of almost magical inventions that are the most
phenomenally lucrative ever seen, have clear commercial uses, and are
being developed almost exclusively by corporate enterprises. We are
aggressively pursuing the promises of these new technologies within the
now unchallenged system of global capitalism and its manifold financial
incentives and competitive pressures. Instead of our course being
determined by our collective values, ethics, and morals, we are being
propelled forward with no plan, no control, and no brake. The 21st
century – your century - will be, he says, “the century of danger.” That’s the message from
Bill Joy. What a challenge to democracy! The Love Bug sent another
message. “I Love You,” said the message on my computer. But it could
have been the inscription our pilots and bombardiers used to scribble on
the nose of the bombs they dropped in Europe and Asia. “I Love You”
– BOOM! As we have since learned, the bug that brought some of the
world’s most sophisticated computer networks to a halt was apparently
hatched in a noisy inner city neighborhood in the Philippines where
residents live under corrugated steel roofs in grubby concrete apartments
and students go to a computer school in an old warehouse without flush
toilets. As the New York Times put it, “The fact that the world’s most
infectious computer virus to date could have such origins illustrates how
vulnerable the Internet’s global sprawl has made it to disruption coming
from even the most remote technological backwaters.” (NYT, May 17,
2000) You and I don’t think
much about the world that spawned the love bug. But a few days after the
virus hit, a friend, who used to live in Austin, sent me an e-mail which
he said more-or-less put things in perspective. It contained a model of
the earth’s population shrunk to a village of precisely one hundred
people, with all the existing human ratios remaining the same. Of the
hundred people, 57 would be Asians, 21 Europeans, 14 would be from the
Western Hemisphere (North and South), and eight would be from Africa. 52
would be female, 48 would be male. 70 would have skin of color, 30 would
be white. 70 would not be Christian, 30 would, and 80 of the 100 would
live in substandard housing. 70 would be unable to read. 50 would suffer
from malnutrition. Only one – yes, one – would have a college
education. Only one would own a computer. Finally, of the 100 people in
our single global village, six would possess 59% of the entire world’s
wealth, and all six would be from the United States. Astonishing, isn’t it?
So much wealth – in the hands of so few? It got me to thinking about
some other things that should be astonishing but seem not to shock us. More children are growing
up poor in America that in any other industrial nation. Millions of workers are
actually making less money today in real dollars than they did twenty
years ago, and can’t afford homes where middle class families once
thrived This should astonish:
More than two million people work in nursing homes – bathing and feeding
frail elderly people, cleaning their bedsores, lifting them out of bed and
into wheelchairs, changing their diapers – for a salary, on average,
between seven and eight dollars an hour. (Reich) And this: Over two
million Americans work in childcare centers or as nannies. They feed the
children, calm their fears, and bandage their bruises. Sing and read to
them – for a median wage of $6.60 an hour, usually with no benefits. And this: More than
700,000 social workers attend to individuals and families suffering from
alcohol and drug abuse, domestic violence, and mental illness. They make
between $8 and $15 an hour. Forty-three million
Americans have no health insurance. One million people have lost their
coverage every year for eight straight years now – during the most
prosperous decade in our history. And medical expenses have become the
major cause of personal bankruptcy. Why doesn’t that astonish us? Some of you may have seen
our documentary on PBS last month called “Surviving the Good
Times.” We filmed it over ten years in the lives of two families in
Milwaukee…the Stanleys and the Neumanns…one white, one black. The
breadwinners in each family were laid off in the first wave of downsizing
in 1991. We reported then on how they were coping with the wrenching
changes in their lives, and we stayed with them over the next ten years as
they tried to find a place in the new global economy. We used to call
these people “the salt of the earth.” They love their kids, care about
their communities, go to church every Sunday, and work hard all week. Both
mothers took full-time jobs to make ends meet. Though they’ve been
running hard they’ve been falling behind. During our time with them the
fathers in both families became seriously ill. One had to stay in the
hospital for two months. When he got out the family was $30,000 in debt
because they didn’t have adequate health care. If you watched the film
you saw the bank starting to foreclose on the modest home of the family
that couldn’t meet the mortgage payments after the dad lost his factory
job. Like millions of Americans, the Stanleys and the Neumanns play by the
rules and still get stiffed. What turns their personal
travail into a political tragedy is that they are patriotic. They love
this country. But they no longer believe they matter to the people who run
the country. When our film opens both families are watching the
inauguration of Bill Clinton on television in 1992. They wouldn’t do
that today. They don’t believe their concerns will ever be addressed by
the political, corporate, and media elites who make up our political
class. They are not cynical. They are deeply religious people with no
capacity for cynicism. But they know the system’s rigged. And they’re
right. You would think a rich,
dynamic nation with the most powerful economy in the world would be
putting its house in order – making sure we are not only a prosperous
society but a just, good, and fair society. It’s not happening. And
it’s not happening because money has a stranglehold on democracy.
Politics has become an arms race, with money doing the work of missiles.
Federal elections cost $2.2 billion dollars in 1996 and could double this
year. Most of that money comes from a relative handful of wealthy
individuals, organizations, and interests. Dominant among them are the
financial and corporate elite who want no rules to govern the social and
economic behavior of investors and multinational corporations, including
those that will control the technologies described by Bill Joy; who want
government to serve only as the protector of their power and privilege;
who want to hold to the barest minimum the wages and salaries of people
who should otherwise share in the profits of industry; who seek subsidies
and tax breaks they want you to pay for; who fight tooth-and-nail against
universal health care; who pour money into both parties in order to
deprive voters of any real political choice. These are the people whose
money largely determines who runs, who wins, and how they govern. Some of them we don’t
even know. The Washington Post reported last week that huge sums of cash
are pouring secretly into politics from groups and individuals seeking to
influence the elections without disclosing their identity. Some of these
slush funds are controlled by members of Congress – including powerful
members of your own Texas delegation who take your votes and do their
donors’ bidding. They – your elected officials – are benefiting from
huge donations from those who want favors from them. And you have no way
of knowing who they are. Our politicians are selling us out and we can’t
hold them accountable because they are doing it in the dark. Remember Roger Tamraz? He
should have been your commencement speaker. He could really tell you how
the system works. Roger Tamraz is the wealthy oilman who paid $300,000 to
get a private meeting in the White House with President Clinton. He wanted
help in securing a big pipeline in Central Asia. This got him called
before congressional hearings into the financial excesses of the 1996
campaign. If you watched those hearings on C-Span you heard him say he
didn’t think he had done anything out of the ordinary. When the senators
pressed him he told them; “Look, when it comes to money and politics,
you make the rules.” One senator then asked if
Tamraz had registered and voted, and he was blunt in his reply. “No,
Senator, I think money’s a bit more than the vote.” You may find this is hard
to swallow. They don’t teach it in your political science courses. You
didn’t get it in high school civics (if you even got high school
civics). But this is how the system works, and it’s why we can’t put
things right for the people who don’t share in America’s prosperity.
The great Justice Learned Hand said it well: “If we are to keep our
democracy there must be one commandment: Thou shalt not ration justice.”
But justice is rationed today. You get if you pay for it. Your political
worth is now determined by your net worth. The private and now
secret financing of public officials has made a mockery of the whole
notion of “one person, one vote.” It is so pernicious and pervasive
that if left unchallenged it will ultimately destroy our democracy. Rich
people should be able to buy more homes than anyone else. They should be
able to buy more cars, more vacations, and more gizmos than anyone else.
But they shouldn’t be able to buy more democracy than anyone else. This isn’t a partisan
issue. Senator John McCain – the conservative Republican – said during
his campaign (before he was overwhelmed by money) that both parties are
selling our elections to the highest bidders. And just listen to Barry
Goldwater. That’s right – Barry Goldwater, patriarch of the
conservative movement in the Republican Party. Here is what Senator
Goldwater said ten years ago: “The fact that liberty
depended on honest elections was of the utmost importance to the patriots who founded
our nation and wrote the Constitution. They knew that corruption destroyed
the prime requisite of constitutional liberty, and independent legislature
free from any influence other than that of the people. To be successful,
representative government assumes that elections will be controlled by the
citizenry at large, not by those who give the most money. Electors must
believe their vote counts. Elected officials must owe their allegiance to
the people, not to their own wealth or to the wealth of interest groups
who speak only for the selfish fringes of the whole community.” Why am I haranguing you
about this on your day of your graduation? Because you’ve got to do
something about it. Our generation has left you with unfinished business.
America needs a new politics of justice and you have to lead it. I know, I
know: your generation has other fish to fry; you have other things on your
mind. I’ve just finished reading a new book by a bright young woman in
her 20s who says your generation considers politics to be “something our
parents did. As for our generation, we are going to make it where it
counts – not in creed or controversy but in shares and silicon, venture
cap, options, startups, hedge funds, broadband, plug-ins, 401(k)s –
those are our buzzwords. The ‘Bill’ we love is Gates, not Clinton. Our
centers of power are where Madison Avenue meets Silicon Valley and Wall
Street bumps into Hollywood – what does politics have to do with me?
I’m smart, I’m educated, and I’m mobile. If the nation goes to hell,
I can pack up my laptop and move to New Zealand, where the taxes are low
and the climate temperate. Right?” Perhaps. New Zealand is
certainly a beautiful country. But the Stanleys and the Neumanns can’t
go there. Nor can the millions of people like them who are lost in
America. And frankly, while all of you are indeed smart, educated, and
mobile, New Zealand would bore you. You belong here, fighting the good
fight. Surely they taught you here that life is not just about you –
it’s about all of us. The world doesn’t end at the border of the self.
Let me read you a letter from a woman – a Czech woman – who survived
the concentration camps under the Nazis, only to watch in increasing
dismay as the postwar communist government, hailed with such hope,
degenerated into corruption and brutality. “Still,” she wrote, “I
did not feel like getting involved in politics; I kept saying to myself,
‘All I want is an ordinary, quiet life.’ But I came to realize that a
quiet, simple life is to raise children, to enjoy the small and great joys
life can offer, you must not only find the right partner, choose the right
occupation, respect the laws of your country and your own conscience but,
most importantly, you must have a solid social foundation on which to
build such a life…You cannot build a happy private life in a corrupt
society anymore than you can build a house in a muddy ditch.” So there’s your task,
my young Texas friends. There’s the unfinished business. Go to it! Thank you for enabling me
to be here with you tonight, to share the happiness, excitement and high
hopes of this moment. In the words of that old Transcendentalist
benediction: “May God keep you safe until the word of your life is fully
spoken.” Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2000 |
|
|