|
Issue
001 <previous< Issue 002
Volume 1 No 2 June 1995
>next> Issue
003 |
|
Women’s Suffrage: The 75th Anniversary of Women’s Right to
Vote It’s hard to believe: On August 26—just 75 years ago—perhaps within the lifetime of your grandmother, or your mother or even yourself—the power of the ballot was still for men only. The fate of a nation was entrusted to half of its citizenry. But on that date one of the most profound changes in American history occurred: the 19th Amendment to the Constitution took effect and women at last had the right to vote. Before the anniversary of that momentous event again passes
unnoticed this year, one might ponder this question: How could women have been
denied such a fundamental role for the first 144 years of our nationhood? Why
was something so obviously right achieved only after decades of passionate
protest, civil disobedience, and old-fashioned, knock-down, family-dividing, church-splitting,
liberal-versus-conservative debate? Christian Ethics: From the Blue Point of the Flame Q. Tony, where did you get your social conscience? Virtues and Values: The
Road Less Traveled Jeremiah 6:16 (RSV) Virtue is purity, strength, valor, courage, uprightness of heart, integrity of soul, virility of spirit. Values are those basic qualities commonly accepted among civilized people as constituting an irreducible minimum by which folks ought to live—anywhere, everywhere, anytime, all the time. Virtues and values are of great importance to everybody. They are of special importance to Christians. The two are virtually synonymous, essentially the same thing. Both are concerned about our personal walk with the Lord “in paths of righteousness” and with our social behavior in morally responsible ways. The cardinal virtues, the primary values, deserve far more
attention than the people of God have been giving them in recent times. They
may be understood as personal qualities with social applications and as social
fruits with personal roots. These two dimensions, the personal and the social,
need to be kept equally in focus, for one without the other is an
oxymoron—incongruous, contradictory, impossible. There Is Hope When I was going to school on the G.I. Bill of Rights, right after the Spanish-American War, they told me that the first few minutes of any address or sermon should be given over to sheer foolishness and nonsense. I reckon John Seigenthaler’s introduction has pretty well covered that so we can proceed to the subject at hand. Whatever that subject may be. Actually, John, I was born in New York City. In the Soho district. My mother was a dancer at Radio City Music Hall with the Rockettes. My father was with the Secret Service guarding Mr. Garfield, until that terrible accident. Then we moved to Mississippi and started picking cotton for a living. And if you’re buying all that I have some choice beachfront property in the Smoky Mountains you might be interested in. Some of you asked about my walking cane. I’m
always glad because that allows me to tell one of my favorite stories. Something
that really happened, though perhaps I should be ashamed to tell it. The cane
was made for me by a neighbor who was what we would call illiterate. But he knew
something abut aesthetics; knew what was pretty; what really, finally mattered.
He tore down an old abandoned barn many years ago and discovered that some of
the rotting timbers were made of wild cherry. He put them aside and when he was
old he made things that were at once beautiful and useful for those he loved.
Fortunately, I was one of them. It is, I think, a fine metaphor for the
Gospel—taking something rotten and making something beautiful of it.
Updated Monday, November 26, 2001 |
NOTE: the footnoting is in
error and must be corrected What is the Radical Religious Right? Who are these people and what are they about? Organized religion historically has been involved
significantly in the American political process. Early twentieth century
American Fundamentalism, although politically conservative, tended to avoid
entanglement in party politics. Under the leadership of Fundamentalists like J. Gresham
Machen, Frank Norris, and Carl Mclntire, American Fundamentalism limited its
political involvement to selected issues such as Prohibition, the teaching of
evolution in public schools, and anti-Communist pronouncements. Some
Fundamentalists, like Jerry Falwell of the 1960s, attributed the moral decline
and civil strife within the United States to the fulfillment of dispensational
premillenialist prophecy concerning the end times. In the sixties, these
Fundamentalists did not emphasize political involvement because of their
professed commitment to winning as many people as possible to Christ prior to
Christ’s second coming. In the late 1 970s, however, Fundamentalist Christians
were enticed onto the political stage by the then New Political Right, an
ultra-conservative highly motivated, politically knowledgeable think tank of
ideologues who were in basic agreement with the Republican party. Maston Colloquium Statement - Countering the Radical Religious Right (A statement made by participants in the Maston Colloquium. Their names are affixed, together with those of others who have identified with it. Convened by the Center for Christian Ethics on May 30, 1995, in Dallas, Texas, the Colloquium name honors Dr. T.B. Maston for his pioneering work in Christian ethics as a teacher, writer, and prophet.) We are a company of American Christians who are committed to
the integrity of our churches, the welfare of our country, and the
strengthening of the moral fiber of our people. The Christian Coalitions “Contract With the American Family”
-
An Analysis In the middle of May, 1995, the Christian Coalition, the brainchild of TV religionist Pat Robertson, introduced with much fanfare its “Contract With the American Family” for consideration by the 1995 Congress. The Coalition declared that the adoption of this Contract would stabilize American society and reintroduce morality and virtue to a society seemingly out of control. This analysis of certain points in the “Contract With the
American Family” attempts to discover what type of morality and virtue is being
promoted by the Christian Coalition, and discern whether that morality
possesses any kinship to the morality and virtue espoused by the Lord Jesus
Christ in the New Testament.
|
|
|